<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Event-Based-Storylines | E4DRR</title><link>https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/tag/event-based-storylines/</link><atom:link href="https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/tag/event-based-storylines/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Event-Based-Storylines</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>IBF as the Inverse of Event-Based Storylines</title><link>https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/blog/2026-01-28-ibf-storylines/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/blog/2026-01-28-ibf-storylines/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction">Introduction&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Impact-Based Forecasting (IBF) and event-based storylines both connect hazard
to impact, but they travel the impact chain in opposite directions. IBF reasons
forward, starting from a forecast and propagating it through exposure and
vulnerability to estimate likely impacts. Event-based storylines reason
backward, starting from an event or impact of interest and reconstructing the
chain of conditions that produced it.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;figure >
&lt;div class="flex justify-center ">
&lt;div class="w-100" >&lt;img alt="IBF forward direction versus event-based storyline backward direction" srcset="
/e4drr/blog/2026-01-28-ibf-storylines/image_hue02e74cf5a039783f57fcdca2f92f342_291451_bca9d0529300577b3426a88c63b7e436.webp 400w,
/e4drr/blog/2026-01-28-ibf-storylines/image_hue02e74cf5a039783f57fcdca2f92f342_291451_dda4b64bb8c37c096fca3da9e5a83294.webp 760w,
/e4drr/blog/2026-01-28-ibf-storylines/image_hue02e74cf5a039783f57fcdca2f92f342_291451_1200x1200_fit_q95_h2_lanczos_3.webp 1200w"
src="https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/e4drr/blog/2026-01-28-ibf-storylines/image_hue02e74cf5a039783f57fcdca2f92f342_291451_bca9d0529300577b3426a88c63b7e436.webp"
width="760"
height="566"
loading="lazy" data-zoomable />&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="forward-direction-impact-based-forecasting">Forward Direction: Impact-Based Forecasting&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>IBF begins with a probabilistic forecast of a hazard and asks: &lt;em>given this
forecast, what impacts are likely, and what actions should follow?&lt;/em> It is
anticipatory and operational, driving triggers, thresholds, and early action
ahead of an event.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="backward-direction-event-based-storylines">Backward Direction: Event-Based Storylines&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Event-based storylines invert this logic. They begin with a plausible or
observed event and ask: &lt;em>what combination of drivers, exposure, and
vulnerability would lead here?&lt;/em> This narrative, conditional framing is useful
for planning, learning, and stress-testing, exploring how an event could unfold
rather than forecasting whether it will.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="why-the-contrast-matters">Why the Contrast Matters&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Treating IBF and storylines as inverse views of the same impact chain clarifies
their complementary roles: IBF for real-time anticipatory action, storylines
for scenario exploration and decision-centric verification. Used together, the
forward and backward perspectives reinforce one another across the forecasting
and preparedness cycle.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Climate Scenario and Event-Based Storylines</title><link>https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/blog/2025-01-21-scenario-storylines/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/blog/2025-01-21-scenario-storylines/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction">Introduction&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Climate scenarios describe plausible future states of the climate system under
different assumptions, while event-based storylines provide a physically
self-consistent narrative of how a specific event could unfold. Together they
offer a structured way to connect climate science to preparedness decisions
under uncertainty.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;figure >
&lt;div class="flex justify-center ">
&lt;div class="w-100" >&lt;img alt="Event-based storylines versus climate scenarios" srcset="
/e4drr/blog/2025-01-21-scenario-storylines/image_hu814215194da2418396670ddc88b4d379_301454_9df6e5f6f400b567a5bc35fe96d394a4.webp 400w,
/e4drr/blog/2025-01-21-scenario-storylines/image_hu814215194da2418396670ddc88b4d379_301454_db5c181b51d8fae190c1ef1ec48c9a2a.webp 760w,
/e4drr/blog/2025-01-21-scenario-storylines/image_hu814215194da2418396670ddc88b4d379_301454_1200x1200_fit_q95_h2_lanczos_3.webp 1200w"
src="https://icpac-igad.github.io/e4drr/e4drr/blog/2025-01-21-scenario-storylines/image_hu814215194da2418396670ddc88b4d379_301454_9df6e5f6f400b567a5bc35fe96d394a4.webp"
width="760"
height="550"
loading="lazy" data-zoomable />&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="climate-scenarios">Climate Scenarios&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Scenarios explore the range of possible futures by varying drivers such as
emissions pathways, socio-economic conditions, and exposure. Rather than
predicting a single outcome, they bound the space of what could happen, helping
decision-makers stress-test plans against a spectrum of conditions.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="event-based-storylines">Event-Based Storylines&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Event-based storylines, as proposed by Sillmann et al. (2021), link climate
projections to preparedness decisions by tracing a coherent chain of cause and
effect for a specific event. They map impact chains across scales, offering a
credible narrative for handling both direct and indirect impacts while
maintaining scientific rigor. This approach complements scenario analysis by
grounding abstract projections in concrete, actionable event narratives.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>